Barely had the new Kaduna State governor occupied his seat
when he banished begging in the state. The deed
was painted as a reaction to a terror attack, but it
was apparent the terror attack was an immediately available
convenient excuse to achieve his aforethought agenda to end the
"irritating" habit. The bomber was not a pretend-beggar.
Within two months of being in office, the governor next
began the aggressive demolition of illegal residences in an entire Alhudahuda
In similar reaction to hawkers, beggars and
illegal land occupiers, governor Fashola of Lagos is remembered for
his demolitions and clamp down on begging. Numerous communities in Lagos were
demolished during his eight years, rendering the occupants homeless in
an instant. And whoever was found homeless, who could have been made homeless
by the very demolitions, was rounded up, kept in "concentration
camps" and deported to any state of the Lagos government's choice. At
least 3000 Nigerians were deported through his tenure. I described these
dumpings, typically on roadsides at outskirts of states in an earlier article.
Also read: El Rufai leading in Kaduna
While the principle of the demolition of illegal structures
is legal, the problem is the reality of the States and nation. Is it fair for
El-Rufai to give notice and demolish in just two months? Can he argue that
notice was given by previous administrations he himself accuses of being
hopeless, unresponsible and unreliable and as such, the occupants should have
expected this sudden inconvenience?
There are some fundamental blunders
and potential crimes in the cases of both governors and they are
borne of the same stock. Let's present it simply:
You must never demolish homes where there is no social
You must never banish begging where there is no social
You must never deport Nigerians irregardless of social
welfare availability. (section 41(1) of the 1999 constitution). When you ban
begging, assuming/after there is housing for the poor and welfare, then you can
arrest and jail the beggars who violate, but you still cannot deport them
The actions of both governors are borne from the same
El-Rufai is the epitome of the Elite. I have for long been
as anxious and worried about him as I have been excited. He is
the archetype of elitism just like Fashola is or became. These men
represent the definition of the elite. They are "pure
blood." They detest destitution. They believe every man must be
affluent or is less than a person. Their reaction to poverty is instantaneous,
harsh and uncompassionate. I do not care that Nigeria's billions have been
looted and the nation has been run into the ground by friends of mine, leaving
you no opportunity for gainful employment. I do not care that if you do not beg
from tonight, you will starve and may die. I do not care that this country has
only fed and built for the rich; that we developed Abuja to be as good as any
developed city, re-paving the roads every year, while leaving the rest of the
nation to rot. All I want is for you to get out of this property this minute
and to get your filthy selves off my streets.
This is the Fashola/El-Rufai mantra. This is the decretum
behind their policies and state actions.
So you see, while it is beautiful and beautifying to rid
Lagos and Kaduna of destitutes, the prerequisites for such decree must be set
in place first.
Before Fashola bans Okada, he should build a thorough Lagos
metro transport system to enable Lagosians get around without each person
depending on a car and as such not only leading to traffic deadlock but
environmental pollution. Build the metro system first before you build Eko
Atlantic haven for the wealthy; then you can ban Okada and the transport-time
will not increase as a hardship for Lagosians.
While you can never or rather, should never deport Nigerians
according to the provisions of our constitution (section 41(1) of the
1999), before you can banish street begging, establish a welfare system and
homes and feeding stipends (Food stamps) for the poor, then you can ban them
Likewise, before you demolish illegal structures, provide
public housing as America did since the early 90's. This is the way of God,
this is the way of logic, this is the way of peace, security and progress. The
El-Rufai/Fashola way, with the chronic institutionalized disadvantagement leads to suffering,
terror and death.
I believe both men are Muslims. In Islamic records, the
banishing of alcohol followed a stage-wise process. First Muslims were told to
decrease their consumption, then it was banned. This is the way of the
prophets. The great leaders of old will not go to bed if any of their
constituents was hungry. Things have so changed now... and this is why we have
MEND and Boko Haram in Nigeria. It is the protection of the rich and
deprivement of the poor that has brought the Wrath of God on Nigeria.
The sudden demolitions in Kaduna have only one outcome as
did the deportation of beggars by Fashola. These lead to deaths. Already
El-Rufai has three deaths on his hands. According to DailyTrust, three Nigerians have already died as a
consequence; "Ali Yayo, a resident of the community behind Alhudahuda,
whose house was demolished, was said to have suddenly slumped and died. “There
were also Sani Anle and Murtalele who also died after their houses were
demolished. At least, seven residents of the area are receiving treatment at
various hospitals in Zaria. One of them is Abubakar Mai Sirfani."
We should not look for a day of reckoning when a blind,
crippled or other destitute, an old man, woman or child will ask what they did
that the governors denied them an existence or dumped them on the side of the
While Nigerians celebrate change, it is advised these
governors and men with great ideas are reasonable and conscious of economics
and management of/for the poor. If they feel they have wronged Nigerians, they
should make atonement. Otherwise a class war will be inevitable in Nigeria.
Praying their indulgence, I [for ENDS] write for
Disclaimer: All articles and letters published on MyNews24 have been independently written by members of News24's community. The views of users published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. News24 editors also reserve the right to edit or delete any and all comments received.