Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.

 

Akingbola Vs EFCC: Court fixes date

18 January 2013, 16:03

Lagos - A Federal High Court, Lagos has fixed Feb. 12 for hearing in a suit filed by former Managing Director of Intercontinental Bank, (now Access Bank), Erastus Akingbola, against the EFCC.

The date was fixed after the case, which is on the seizure of Akingbola’s property, could not be heard on Friday because the new judge it was assigned to, Justice

Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia, was indisposed.
Joined as respondents in the suit are the EFCC Chairman, Mr Ibrahim Lamorde, and one Mr E.L Etudo.

Akingbola had filed the suit on March 29, 2012, challenging the respondents for denying him access to his property known as ``Amazing Grace Plaza’’.

He faulted the action of the EFCC in appointing Etudo as an agent to manage his property and collect rents or charges on it.

The applicant contended that his property, which was affected by an interim order of court in December 2009, had not been forfeited to the Federal Government and so the respondent had no right to deal with the property.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that when the case came up last, Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako, had ruled that EFCC had no right to deal with the seized property.

She had said that the respondent ought to have approached the court to appoint a receiver to manage the said property of the applicant, pending the conclusion of Akingbola’s criminal trial.

The judge had said that the law on forfeited properties was that it should be placed under seal and if for any reason it was not expedient to do so, the commission should go back to the court for direction.

She said that even though the properties had been forfeited to the Federal Government in the interim, the commission lacked the mandate to unilaterally appoint someone to manage the properties.

Meanwhile, the court had also restrained
Akingbola from dealing with the properties in any manner whatsoever, in line with the interim order of court, given in 2009.

NAN

NEXT ON NEWS24 NIGERIAX

Read News24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Rotimi Opeyeoluwa
Fayose weill bring about a return...

The speculation had been rife for some time that Abuja, nay the ruling People’s Democratic Party, (PDP), has long concluded plans about capturing the South-West at all cost. Read more...

Submitted by
Peregrino Brimah
Letter to 1 mllion youth defraude...

For too long, Nigerians have lacked and missed opportunities of true growth, true strength, true progress, true peace, true prosperity and true national competitiveness. Read more...

Submitted by
Peregrino Brimah
Death everywhere: The consequence...

Everywhere we look in Nigeria today and see death; it is not an accident. It is the price the people pay for the corruption of the government.  Read more...

Submitted by
Tque Majolagbe
Much ado about GDP rebasing

Over the years, successive governments in Nigeria have always bamboozled us with great terminologies such as GDP, per capita and other macroeconomic indices. Read more...

Submitted by
Peregrino Brimah
Who massacred the Fulani In Keana...

The chronology of the events that lead up to the attack on the Fulani settlement in Nasarawa State which left up to 30 people dead. Read more...

Submitted by
Peregrino Brimah
#XYZMassacre: We want A Revolutio...

Which massacre? Yobe? Borno? Adamawa? Plateau? Katsina? Kaduna? Benue? Nasarawa? The hashtag, “#XYZmassacre” has become the inevitably appropriate marker for the Nigerian holocaust.  Read more...