Hello 

Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.


Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.

 

Akingbola Vs EFCC: Court fixes date

18 January 2013, 16:03

Lagos - A Federal High Court, Lagos has fixed Feb. 12 for hearing in a suit filed by former Managing Director of Intercontinental Bank, (now Access Bank), Erastus Akingbola, against the EFCC.

The date was fixed after the case, which is on the seizure of Akingbola’s property, could not be heard on Friday because the new judge it was assigned to, Justice

Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia, was indisposed.
Joined as respondents in the suit are the EFCC Chairman, Mr Ibrahim Lamorde, and one Mr E.L Etudo.

Akingbola had filed the suit on March 29, 2012, challenging the respondents for denying him access to his property known as ``Amazing Grace Plaza’’.

He faulted the action of the EFCC in appointing Etudo as an agent to manage his property and collect rents or charges on it.

The applicant contended that his property, which was affected by an interim order of court in December 2009, had not been forfeited to the Federal Government and so the respondent had no right to deal with the property.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that when the case came up last, Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako, had ruled that EFCC had no right to deal with the seized property.

She had said that the respondent ought to have approached the court to appoint a receiver to manage the said property of the applicant, pending the conclusion of Akingbola’s criminal trial.

The judge had said that the law on forfeited properties was that it should be placed under seal and if for any reason it was not expedient to do so, the commission should go back to the court for direction.

She said that even though the properties had been forfeited to the Federal Government in the interim, the commission lacked the mandate to unilaterally appoint someone to manage the properties.

Meanwhile, the court had also restrained
Akingbola from dealing with the properties in any manner whatsoever, in line with the interim order of court, given in 2009.

NAN

NEXT ON NEWS24 NIGERIAX

Read News24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
0 comments
Add your comment
Comment 0 characters remaining

Read more from our Users

Submitted by
Hussain Obaro
Xenophobia: We are all guilty

Many countries in Africa and around the world have continued to victimize, de-humanize and blame migrants and foreign workers for their rising unemployment and economic challenge. Read more...

Submitted by
Peregrino Brimah
Support President Jonathan to #Re...

What is the urgency of this amendment and why are our legislators so desperate they even threatened to impeach president Jonathan at this last hour if he does not sign it? Read more...

Submitted by
Lip of Truth
Aso Rock: Dealing with the Pentec...

The Presidential election is over and a new tenant will occupy Aso Rock. He must deal with the Pentecostal Pastors, who often parade the villa for personal profit. Read more...

Submitted by
Samuel Ufot Ekerere
Choice: Becoming a success or bec...

In todays fast pace rat raced society, we find ourselves in a persistent pursuit for the things that we hope can offer us a better comfortable life than we have being used to. Read more...

Submitted by
Markjackson Dumani
Loans: What we need to know

Almost every research on small scale business is with the cliche; inadequate capital or lack of finance for start ups and for expansion of a business. Read more...

Submitted by
Markjackson Dumani
Systemic corruption and the way f...

The socio-political system of a place like that of human biology is self-regulating. That is, they are self-correcting through feedback. Read more...