Create Profile

Creating your profile will enable you to submit photos and stories to get published on News24.

Please provide a username for your profile page:

This username must be unique, cannot be edited and will be used in the URL to your profile page across the entire 24.com network.

Facebook Sign-In

Hi News addict,

Join the News24 Community to be involved in breaking the news.

Log in with Facebook to comment and personalise news, weather and listings.


Google chief defends Android in court

19 April 2012, 11:45

San Francisco - Google co-founder Larry Page stuck to his guns in a San Francisco court on Wednesday, testifying that the internet giant did nothing wrong when it built the Android platform for mobile gadgets.

Page returned to the stand to field questions in a trial over accusations by business software titan Oracle that Google opted to infringe on Java program copyright and patents instead of licensing code from Sun Microsystems.

"We did nothing wrong," Page said as he duelled with an Oracle attorney. "We are very careful about what information we use and do not use."

Page, swapping standard Silicon Valley casual wear for a charcoal gray suit, light blue shirt and matching tie, kept his eyes toward the jury and smiled tightly as he testified.

Page held firm even when confronted with a key piece of evidence - an e-mail from Android team engineers saying that Google should license Java technology from Sun Microsystems for the Android project.


Google worked long and hard with Sun to work out a way to incorporate Java into a smartphone platform, but efforts failed and Google went its own way with Android, according to Page.

"I think Sun, and now Oracle, needed something that actually worked," Page said. "We had a closet full of Java phones that didn't work."

While Google would have preferred to collaborate with Sun, it invested in its own smartphone platform, according to the co-founder.

"Things like the iPhone didn't have Java at all and somehow magically got in consumers' hands," Page said. "I don't think it mattered."

The chiefs of Google and Oracle were opening witnesses this week in a patent case aimed at Android software used to power smartphones and tablet computers.

Oracle is accusing Google of infringing on Java computer programming language patents and copyrights Oracle obtained when it bought Java inventor Sun Microsystems in a $7.4bn deal brokered in 2009.

Google has denied the claims and said it believes mobile phone makers and other users of its open-source Android operating system are entitled to use the Java technology in dispute.


Google unveiled the free Android operating system two years before Oracle bought Sun.

Protecting and profiting from Java software technology were prime reasons for Oracle's decision in 2009 to buy Sun, according to evidence presented so far at trial.

While testifying on Tuesday, Oracle chief Larry Ellison said that Oracle had considered buying Palm or BlackBerry-maker Research In Motion to get into the smartphone market but didn't follow through.

Under questioning at trial, Oracle chief corporate architect Edward Screven said that Ellison and others at the company had considered using Java to build a smartphone platform but decided it wasn't feasible.

"Google's Android-Java clone had basically foreclosed the market from us," Screven said.

Screven went on to say that Sun had "lost its way" by the time Oracle bought it and that making money on Sun software available free was one of the ways to recoup the price paid by Oracle.

Part of the Google defence is that Oracle couldn't figure out a way into the smartphone market so is trying to leech off of Android's success by pressing claims regarding Java software that Sun made publicly available.

"If people could copy our software and create cheap knockoffs of our products, we wouldn't get paid for our engineering and wouldn't be able to invest what we invest," Ellison said during his testimony.

Ellison, an experienced courtroom witness, exuded confidence on the stand while Page seemed cautious and evasive, causing the judge to prompt him to directly answer yes-or-no questions.

The trial before US District Court Judge William Alsup could last as long as eight weeks if jurors find that Google did infringe on Oracle's intellectual property and a damages phase is needed.



Read News24’s Comments Policy

Comment on this story
Comments have been closed for this article.

Read more from our Users

Nigeria @ 56: Words to my green f...

A leader’s job is not to dictate, but rather to be respected, admired and be a trustee, of the land we love, with so much potential, a land which should be freer than free. Its still a long way to fufilling our destiny! Read more...

Submitted by
Isaac Asabor263
Recession: An opportunity for Nig...

The recession should be seen as an opportunity for the country’s promotion as long as we all collectively conduct ourselves in a patriotic manner, writes Isaac Asabor.  Read more...

Submitted by
Black and White

We want to imitate the whites in everything because we are ignorant of our inherent originality and content. We spend all our Naira to acquire his inventions because we so oblivious of our natural endowments that we allow him have it for free. Read more...

Submitted by
Nate Nat
Adamawa State University Mubi: A ...

ADSU integrity forum has accused the Sunday Joshua Wugira, a lawyer, of adopting unorthodox tactics by abusing his privilege by attacking the integrity of ADSU Vice Chancellor Dr. Moses Zira Zaruwa, writes a News24 reader. Read more...

Submitted by
Abdulsalam Jubril
My Country Nigeria (Part One)

Poetry by Abdulsalam Jubril.

Submitted by
Abdulsalam Jubril
Recession, dearth in leadership a...

Every leader has the opportunity to become great and making himself immortal in the lives and hearts of people for generations to come. Will Mr. President seize this opportunity?, questions Abdulsalam Jubril. Read more...